Home

 

Filmy fern - Hymenophyllum wilsonii

     
Invasive Woody Plants

Tree Autecology and Biology

Temperate Forest Ecology

Tropical Forest Ecology

Forestry

Sand Dune Ecology

East Usambaras

Pitcairn Islands

 

THE STATUS OF THE FILMY FERN (HYMENOPHYLLUM WILSONII Hook.)

IN THE NATIONAL TRUST NATURE RESERVE

MURLOUGH BAY, CO. ANTRIM, NORTHERN IRELAND

by

Dr. B.S. Rushton, Miss M. Gault, Miss A. Graham

and Mr. P. Binggeli

Applied Ecological Sciences Research Group

Department of Biological and Biomedical Sciences

University of Ulster

Coleraine, Northern Ireland, BT52 1SA

Report submitted to the National Trust in 1990.

 

BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY

The European Social Fund financed the training of six people in the field of ecological surveying at the University of Ulster (Department of Biological and Biomedical Sciences) from September, 1988 to August, 1989. As part of the training programme, the students had to complete an original ecological survey in the last five months - two trainees, Miss Gault and Miss Graham chose to examine the growth and distribution of the Wilson's Filmy Fern (Hymenophyllum wilsonii Hook.) in the Birch-Rowan-Hazel wood that nestles under the cliff at Fair Head, Murlough Bay, County Antrim. This report records the data generated as a result of the fieldwork and includes some initial data summaries and conclusions. It is anticipated that a fuller report might be produced at a later stage and that further fieldwork might be undertaken to remedy deficiencies in the present data set.

INTRODUCTION

Murlough Bay is situated on the North Antrim coast, between Fair Head and Torr Head and approximately six kms from Ballycastle.

The Birch-Rowan-Hazel (Betula pubescens Ehrh., Sorbus aucuparia L., Corylus avellana L.) woodland at Murlough Bay, which lies under the cliff of Fair Head, is one of the few remaining natural woodlands in Northern Ireland, thus making it an area of scientific interest. It now forms part of the National Trust Nature Reserve. However, like many natural woodlands in Britain and Ireland, it is being invaded by the non-native Sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus L.). The Sycamore is steadily increasing its hold in the woodland and in time will inevitably replace many of the Birch, Rowan and Hazel trees thus changing the character of the wood (Binggeli and Rushton, 1985).

Within the woodland, there exists the uncommon fern, Hymenophyllum wilsonii Hook. (Wilson's Filmy Fern). This species is frequent in western Scotland, the English Lake District, north Wales and south-west Ireland (Page, 1982) and the main factor controlling its distribution appears to be the number of rainy days/year (Richards and Evans, 1972). Elsewhere, the species is more scattered and in Northern Ireland is found in only approximately 19 10-km squares (Jermy et al. 1978) - the occurrence of the fern in the Birch-Rowan-Hazel wood at Murlough Bay probably represents one of the larger concentration areas for the species in the north of Ireland. The species is tolerant of shade (Page, 1982) and sometimes spreads into very deep shade (Page, 1982). However, the estimated increase in canopy cover of the Sycamore in the wood (Binggeli and Rushton, 1985) will inevitably lead to an increase in deep shade conditions and this could result in long-term (or permanent) damage or possible extinction of the H. wilsonii population at Murlough Bay.

H. wilsonii is a gregarious species, found on outcrops of rocks, on large moss covered boulders, on the trunks of trees and in turf amongst grasses and mosses. In Murlough Bay, the plant is nearly exclusively confined to large moss covered boulders and has only been seen once as an epiphyte on the trees. The specific habitat requirements of the fern in the wood are unknown and the actual distribution and abundance of the species in the wood are similarly not recorded. This short report records the results and preliminary findings of an investigation into the status of the species in the wood.

SURVEY AREA

The survey area at Murlough Bay was situated on a steep slope between 90 and 190 m above sea level and has an east/north-easterly aspect (Binggeli and Rushton, 1985). The wood itself is made up of a series of smaller slopes.  The boulders on which the H. wilsonii colonies are found have fallen from the cliff above.  Sampling was difficult in places either because boulders were too large to examine or localised areas were inaccessible; the lower, more easily accessible parts of the wood were more intensively surveyed. Initially, it was thought that the whole of the wood could be surveyed; in the event, only about half of the wood was searched.

METHODS

On each field day, areas of the wood were searched for colonies of H. wilsonii. For each colony found, a number of characteristics of the colony, of the substrate, and of surrounding trees were recorded. These were as follows:

  1. the angle of the rock face on which the colony was growing;

  2. the height of the rock;

  3. the height of the top of the colony from the ground surface;

  4. the height of the bottom of the colony from the ground surface;

  5. the size of the colony;

  6. the depth of the colony on the rock surface (measured by inserting a graduated metal rod into the colony, ten measurements);

  7. the average frond density (estimated from a count of the number of fronds in three 4 cm x 4 cm quadrats randomly placed over the colony);

  8. the direction in which the colony was facing;

  9. a list of the other species growing inside (i.e. growing intermingled with the colony) and outside (i.e. surrounding and touching) the colony;

  10. for each tree over hanging a colony the following were noted:

  • the tree species;

  • the distance of the tree trunk from the colony;

  • the compass bearing of the tree from the colony;

  • the diameter of the tree canopy in that sector of the canopy that overlapped the colony.

The data were encoded into a dBASE IV data base and a copy of this is available. It was not possible in the time available to compose an accurate map of all the colonies found since the exceptionally difficult terrain made mapping hazardous and prone to serious error; at a latter date, a mapping exercise might be initiated. Undoubtedly, colonies were missed by the exercise, particularly the smaller ones, but those found probably represent a reasonable picture of the status of the species in the woodland.

RESULTS

124 colonies were found and recorded. The majority of rocks had only one colony (96 rocks in all), though one rock had seven colonies and another five rocks had three colonies each. The results for individual colonies are tabulated in Appendices A and B.

Examination of the colonies under different tree canopies (Table 1) indicated that up to five trees could be found over hanging individual colonies. The nearest tree was nearly always a Birch, Rowan or a Hazel (98 colonies) whilst Sycamore was the nearest tree for only 18 colonies. When the second nearest tree was examined, Sycamore was better represented (30 colonies) but still the native trees accounted for 76 colonies. The fern was rarely found under Ash - only in seven cases was Ash the nearest tree and colonies were only found under eight Ash trees in total.

TABLE 1. The number of colonies of Hymenophyllum wilsonii under different tree canopies. *

 

Tree position

 

Tree**

1

2

3

4

5

Tree density***

Birch

49

26

25

5

0

1016 trees/ha

Rowan

37

29

15

10

1

244 trees/ha

Hazel

12

21

9

4

1

236 trees/ha

Sycamore

18

30

9

10

0

21 trees/ha

Ash

7

1

0

0

0

15 trees/ha

Hawthorn

1

1

0

0

0

Not known

*1 = tree nearest to the colony, 2 = tree next nearest the colony, etc.
**  Birch = Betula pubescens, Rowan = Sorbus aucuparia, Hazel = Corylus avellana, Sycamore = Acer pseudoplatanus, Hawthorn = Crataegus monogyna.
*** from Binggeli and Rushton (1985).

Table 2 lists various characteristics associated with the rocks on which the fern was growing and characteristics of the colonies themselves. The rocks on which the fern was growing were on average 51o from the vertical, though at least one rock was vertical and another horizontal. The mean rock height was 131 cm and the mean height of the top of the colonies on the rock was 117 cm, i.e. quite close to the top. The bottom of the colonies were on average only just below the middle portion of the rocks (mean height of the bottom of the colonies 68 cm). Although some individual colonies were growing on the base of the rocks, the majority of the growth was on the upper parts.

TABLE 2. Overall characteristics of the 124 Hymenophyllum wilsonii colonies.

 

Mean

Maximum

Minimum

Angle of rock (o)

51

90

0

Height of rock (cm)

131

350

20

Height of top of colony (cm)

117

300

20

Height of bottom of colony (cm)

68

240

0

Colony size (cm2)

1813

15000

10

Depth of colony (cm)

4.3

13.0

1.0

Frond density (no. of fronds/cm2)

1.06

4.50

0.19

The colonies themselves were very variable, in terms of size, colony depth and frond density. Indeed, this latter characteristic was particularly variable there being between 0.19 and 4.50 fronds per cm2. The largest colony was approximately 70 cm. in radius. Richards and Evans (1972) suggest that Filmy Ferns grow at about 6 cm in 3 years i.e. 2 cm/year which would make such a colony about 35 years old if it is assumed to be a single plant, though Richards and Evans (1972) believe that some colonies may be centuries old.

When rock characteristics and colony characteristics were examined in relationship to the tree cover (Table 3) the most obvious difference between the colonies was that those colonies growing where a Sycamore was the closest tree (Table 3A) were smaller (1104 cm2) with a lower frond density (0.81 fronds/cm2) and a smaller colony depth (3.4 cm) when compared with colonies in which the closest tree was either a Birch, Rowan or Hazel. The same pattern was repeated when the colonies were examined in respect to the second closest tree (Table 3B).

TABLE 3. Characteristics of Hymenophyllum wilsonii colonies in respect of the nearest tree (A) and the next nearest tree (B). The seven characteristics are as listed in Table 2, and in the same units.

A. The nearest tree:

 

Birch

 Rowan

 Hazel

Sycamore

Ash

Hawthorn

No. of colonies

49

37

12

18

7

1

Angle of rock

53

48

47

57

44

46

Height of rock

126

150

145

117

97

80

Top of colony

112

127

138

111

84

80

Bottom of colony

68

68

82

67

60

30

Colony size

1763

2272

1775

1104

1165

5041

Depth of colony

4.1

4.9

3.8

3.4

5.0

8.5

Density of fronds

1.00

1.19

1.25

0.81

1.00

1.94

B. The next nearest tree:

 

Birch

Rowan

Hazel

Sycamore

Ash

Hawthorn

None

No. of colonies

26

29

21

30

1

1

16

Angle of rock

50

44

57

55

60

46

46

Height of rock

115

154

143

131

200

110

101

Top of rock

109

128

129

118

175

110

91

Bottom of colony

69

75

81

64

125

25

45

Colony size

1656

2201

2207

1221

6000

4473

1529

Depth of colony

3.4

5.4

4.8

3.5

3.0

8.0

4.5

Density of fronds

0.94

1.13

1.69

0.75

1.88

1.25

0.81

 

The colonies showed a strong preference for growth on rocks facing north, north-west, and north-east (Table 4) -  81% of all colonies growing on these types of rocks. Very few colonies grew on rocks facing in a southerly or a south-easterly direction.

TABLE 4. Number of Hymenophyllum wilsonii colonies on rocks of different aspect.

Aspect

Number of colonies

% of colonies

West

2

1.6

North west

38

30.7

North

13

10.5

North east

50

40.3

East

9

7.3

South east

3

2.4

South

3

2.4

South west

6

4.8

An analysis of the species (mainly Bryophytes) growing with the colonies and around the colonies is given in Table 5. Many species were only encountered on a few occasions but about nine species were found quite frequently with the fern. There seemed to be two types of associated species. Some species grew inside the colonies but were found less frequently growing outside the colonies by themselves i.e. they appear to have invaded the colonies with apparent ease, though of course it could be that the fern was the invader. Such species were Dicranum majus, Polytrichum alpinum, Plagiothecium undulatum, Scapania nemorea and Thuidium tamariscinum. The second group of species were less numerous and less well defined but essentially were more usually found either growing around the colony, but not in it, or both inside and outside the colonies but rarely only inside the colonies without being outside also. Such species were Hylocomium splendens, Mnium hornum, Polytrichum commune and Oxalis acetosella.

TABLE 5. Species associated with Hymenophyllum wilsonii colonies. Species are divided into the number of times they occur growing intermingled with the colony (inside); the number of times they grow touching the perimeter of the colony but not actually with the fern (outside); and the number of times they occur both outside and inside the colony.

Species

Inside only

Both inside and outside

Outside only

Brachythecium rutabulum

5

2

0

Dicranella heteromalla

0

1

0

Dicranum majus

17

11

10

Hylocomium splendens

0

6

4

Hypnum cupressiforme

17

28

28

Hypnum jutlandicum

1

0

1

Isothecium myurum

0

1

0

Luzula sylvatica

0

0

2

Mnium hornum

7

16

13

Oxalis acetosella

2

5

8

Pellia epiphyllia

2

1

0

Plagiothecium undulatum

21

20

4

Pleurozium schreberi

1

1

0

Polypodium vulgare

1

1

7

Polytrichum alpinum

26

17

4

Polytrichum commune

2

7

5

Polytrichum juniperum

1

1

0

Rubus sp.

0

0

2

Rhacomitrium heterostichum

0

1

0

Rhitidiadelphus loreus

4

4

2

Rhitidiadelphus squarrosus

13

25

12

Scapania nemorea

3

11

1

Thuidium tamariscinum

21

45

12

Species nomenclature follows:
Smith (1980) for mosses
Watson (1981) for liverworts
Clapham, Tutin and Moore (1987) for vascular plants.

Some associated species have still to be positively identified from voucher material.

CONCLUSIONS

The following conclusions may be drawn from the above preliminary assessment of the data:

1. There are at least 124 colonies of the fern in the woodland and the distribution of these colonies would seem to be related to tree species, with fewer colonies being found under Sycamore trees than under the native species. However, it should be remembered that there are fewer Sycamore trees in the wood generally.

2. Under a Sycamore canopy, the fern has smaller colonies which have a lower frond density and are shallower. Whether this is due to poorer growth conditions under the Sycamore canopy or because the colonies under Sycamore are perhaps younger is unknown. If the former is the case, then increase of the Sycamore canopy over time will be highly detrimental to the continued presence of the fern in the wood. It should be remembered that, currently, most of the Sycamores in the wood are comparatively young and therefore their canopy is not too extensive thus allowing plenty of light (particularly obliquely from the side) to reach the ground. In these cases, the Sycamores have had little influence yet on the ground flora. However, the flora is dramatically impoverished under the very large Sycamores where only a few moss species survive.

3. The colonies prefer north, north-east and north-west facing rock and tend to grow on the top half of the rock faces.

4. Twenty one species of mainly Bryophytes were found growing in the colonies and a further two species, both vascular plants (Luzula sylvatica and Rubus sp.), were growing alongside the fern but not actually intermingled with it. Some of these Bryophytes are very vigorous and probably represent competitors.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We should like to thank the National Trust for permission to work on the site and the European Social Fund for providing financial assistance.

REFERENCES

Binggeli, P. and Rushton, B.S. (1985). A management oriented study of the Birch-Rowan-Hazel woodland at Murlough Bay, Co. Antrim. Ir. For. 42, 16-32.

Clapham, A.R., Tutin, T.G. and Moore, D.M. (1987). Flora of the British Isles. Cambridge.

Jermy, A.C., Arnold, H.R., Farrell, L. and Perring, F.H. eds. (1978). Atlas of ferns of the British Isles. London.

Page, C.N. (1982). The ferns of Britain and Ireland. Cambridge.

Richards, P.W. and Evans, G.B. (1972). Biological flora of the British Isles: Hymenophyllum tunbrigense (L.) Sm. and H. wilsonii Hooker. J. Ecol. 60, 245-268.

Smith, A.J.E. (1980). The moss flora of Britain and Ireland. Cambridge.

Watson, E.V. (1981). British mosses and liverworts. Cambridge.

     
    Copyright © 1999-2000 Pierre Binggeli. All rights reserved.